首页> 外文OA文献 >Effects of test sample shape and surface production method on the fatigue behaviour of PMMA bone cement
【2h】

Effects of test sample shape and surface production method on the fatigue behaviour of PMMA bone cement

机译:试样形状和表面生产方法对pmma骨水泥疲劳性能的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

There is no consensus over the optimal criterion to define the fatigue life of bone cement in vitro. Fatigue testing samples have been made into various shapes using different surface preparation techniques with little attention being paid to the importance of these variations on the fatigue results. The present study focuses on the effect of test sample shape and surface production method on the fatigue results. The samples were manufactured with two cross sectional shapes: rectangular according to ISO 527 and circular according to ASTM F2118. Each shape was produced using two methods: direct moulding of the cement dough and machining from oversized rods. Testing was performed twice using two different bone cements: SmartSet GHV and DePuy CMW1. At least 10 samples of each category were tested, under fully reversed tension-compression fatigue stress at ±20MPa, to allow for Weibull analysis to compare results. The growths of fatigue cracks were compared by means of the variations in energy absorption. It was found that fatigue crack growth can be altered by the sample shape and production method; however it is also dependent on the chemical composition of the cement. The results revealed that moulded samples, particularly those based on the ASTM F2118 standard, can lead to up to 5.5 times greater fatigue lives compared to the machined samples. It is thus essential, when comparing the fatigue results of bone cement, to consider the effect of production method along with the shape of the test sample.
机译:关于确定体外骨水泥疲劳寿命的最佳标准尚无共识。已经使用不同的表面制备技术将疲劳测试样品制成各种形状,而很少注意这些变化对疲劳结果的重要性。本研究的重点是试样形状和表面制备方法对疲劳结果的影响。样品具有两种横截面形状:根据ISO 527的矩形和根据ASTM F2118的圆形。每种形状都使用两种方法生产:直接模制水泥面团和用超大型杆进行机加工。使用两种不同的骨水泥进行了两次测试:SmartSet GHV和DePuy CMW1。在±20MPa的完全反向拉伸-压缩疲劳应力下,测试了每个类别的至少10个样品,以进行威布尔分析以比较结果。通过能量吸收的变化来比较疲劳裂纹的增长。已经发现,通过样品的形状和生产方法可以改变疲劳裂纹的发展。但是,它也取决于水泥的化学组成。结果表明,模压样品,特别是那些基于ASTM F2118标准的样品,与机械加工样品相比,可导致疲劳寿命延长5.5倍。因此,在比较骨水泥的疲劳结果时,必须考虑生产方法的影响以及测试样品的形状。

著录项

  • 作者

    Sheafi, E.M.; Tanner, K.E.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号